Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 11:01:31 +0100 From: Tilman Linneweh <tilman@arved.de> To: Max Okumoto <okumoto@ucsd.edu> Cc: libh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What are are you devel on? Message-ID: <20021220100131.GA23780@huckfinn.arved.de> In-Reply-To: <hffzst1sh4.fsf@multivac.sdsc.edu> References: <20021213215759.GC2175@lenny.anarcat.ath.cx> <hffzst1sh4.fsf@multivac.sdsc.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] In arved.freebsd.libh, you wrote: >> Because of this incompatibility, the kde-freebsd people would like >> to push people to port their apps to qt3, so that qt2* can be removed, >> as soon no major app depends on it. > > The problem is that the libh binary need to be staticly linked. So > we need them to create the static libraries. If someone submits a slave port like the qt23-static. I'll look at it. libh seems to be the only port, that needs a static library. But if you are seriously planning to move to qt3, a static version should be added. >> > >> > tvision-0.8 does not compile with gcc32. >> > (Note; I have a patch for this... but I have not done >> > extensive tests with it yet.) >> >> If you have patches, please submit them, since the port is currently >> marked broken on 5.0 > > Its has not been tested... and depending on the answer to the later > questions I may clean it up or drop it. Does anyone else want/need > tvision? libh seems to be the only port that uses tvision. If your patches are fixing the build on 5.0 and are not breaking the port on STABLE, go ahead and make them public :). > >> > Are we planning on going to qt30 and how are we going to handle the >> > share vs static linking issue? >> > >> > Do we want our own copy of tvision until I can find who maintains the >> > ports version. Or are we planing on moving to rhtvision? Do we >> > want to GPL libh? >> >> The tvision port is currently unmaintained, perhaps maintainer should >> be passed to libh@freebsd.org? > > Who would we talk to about this? Do we want to do this? :-) I was just asking, since you are the only people that use the port, you probably want to review patches to the port. > The original code is copyrighted by Borland but is freely available from > the net. Try here. This port is distributed under the GPL license and > the Sigala's port under a BSD like license. [stuff deleted] > > Which is why I am asking. Sorry, didn't know that. I'll hide under my stone again. But i would prefer using tvision because of the license. regards arved [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+Aup6fCLDn4B6xToRAlfeAJ49Sk+OWuKyWUc21WTjx+HQ01iGewCePw42 RkhlkPx86SIemzWtAlAkTQo= =UYei -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021220100131.GA23780>