Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 21:23:01 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS-UP new statfs structure Message-ID: <20031116052301.GA6241@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <p06002018bbdca66d3d67@[128.113.24.47]> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10311141645540.7284-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <3FB6ACA5.B4192F55@mindspring.com> <20031115231603.GA5139@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> <20031116022031.GA8359@dragon.nuxi.com> <p06002018bbdca66d3d67@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:05:51PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > Or maybe the real problem is that we claim that there will > be no API/ABI changes after X.0-RELEASE, and we've really > missed that mark with 5.0-RELEASE, for a variety of reasons. Where do we claim that? All I'm aware of is the policy of not trying to break compatibility in -STABLE, although that isn't strictly adhered to in practise. Kris --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/twm1Wry0BWjoQKURApGTAJ94Lg6sUOwAr1KdTCELEW8lKzs9LwCgmWIc C4i6YllhQsmhpT3iGIjPwAY= =5lJ6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031116052301.GA6241>