Date: Wed, 04 Sep 1996 08:19:58 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth), gjennejohn@frt.dec.com, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Latest Current build failure Message-ID: <199609041519.IAA16653@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 04 Sep 1996 10:54:10 %2B0200." <199609040854.KAA00846@vector.jhs.no_domain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>But CVSup is not the only appropriate solution ... >We've had developers who produced useful code but were doomed to bad coms >links. CTM is asynchronous to net disturbances, so ideal for those with >poor net access, whereas cvsup requires a net in good condition. This isn't true since CVSup is a streaming protocol instead of a synchronous like SUP. I know quite a few people who switched from CTM to CVSup that have poor links to the net. >Julian >-- >Julian H. Stacey jhs@freebsd.org http://www.freebsd.org/~jhs/ -- Justin T. Gibbs =========================================== FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations ===========================================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609041519.IAA16653>