Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:07:15 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD security auditing project. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9911231403560.46173-100000@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <19991123140303.B49964@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, David O'Brien wrote: > A security review is never done. We need to be in a mode where every > commit is suspect and people are compelled to review it. BDE's use of > CTM to review changes is actually rather affective in this reguard. A CVS tag would also accomplish this and could be slid forward when the new commit is reviewed. I don't know how feasible this would be from the POV of CVS mechanics, but it has the advantage of being in the main tree for everyone to see. Kris ---- Cthulhu for President! For when you're tired of choosing the _lesser_ of two evils.. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.9911231403560.46173-100000>