Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 4 Jan 2026 18:02:09 +0300
From:      Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: A question on how much of my list messaging is considered inappropriate content for the lists I post to?
Message-ID:  <20260104180209.585347eb16ad8caf84c43e44@gmail.com>
References:  <BED67752-363D-46EE-8DD6-7FDDC6998EE8@yahoo.com> <7d2a8e91-c78b-4207-a4ab-41056333bdd5@gmail.com> <20260101182647.83e09e83e81605690b1ff0fc@dec.sakura.ne.jp>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

Tomoaki AOKI:

> Another thing I can mention is "broken threads".  Replying as
> top post makes traking things harder.
>
> I assume it could be because Mark is receiving ML posts as
> summary.  Or copy&pasting from web ML archives like I do for
> dev-commits-* MLs.

Can we ask Mark to please reconsider his posting habits and to
reply to the correct individual messages, offering our help with
configuring his software to facilitate correct threading?

I have used three approaches:

1. Set up a server-side filter rule that puts all messages to
   and from a mailing list into a dedicated IMAP directory.
   That way, threading is preserved, the messages are out of the
   way of my main INBOX, and digest mode is not required, so
   that I can review individual messages and reply to them as
   needed.  I was using Gmail filters, but they may be set up
   with other e-mail providers, and even locally (procmail,
   Sylpheed filter rules, &c).

2. Locate the individual message in the archive, take the
   Message-ID: header form it, and append it to the References:
   header of my reply.  Good clients will you do that.

3. Use Gmane for both reading and posting (as I am doing now).



home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20260104180209.585347eb16ad8caf84c43e44>