Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 03:02:43 -0800 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: "Cheffo" <cheffo@FreeBSD-BG.org> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (S)ATA performance in FBSD 6.2/7.0 Message-ID: <002d01c75d83$7b349110$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> References: <45E7F09B.7070005@zedat.fu-berlin.de><00c401c75caf$89ee3370$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <45E80CC5.8080607@FreeBSD-BG.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: "Cheffo" <cheffo@FreeBSD-BG.org> To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> Cc: <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>; "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>; <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 3:38 AM Subject: Re: (S)ATA performance in FBSD 6.2/7.0 > Hi, > > > I think the problem is that the benchmark runs with small files and most > files are in cache that's why it shows higher speeds I think the problem is O Hartmann (the OP) has proven by his lack of followup that he was just trolling. Kind of what I guessed yesterday. Ted
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002d01c75d83$7b349110$3c01a8c0>