Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 13:12:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Graichen <graichen@innominate.de> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: SOFTUPDATES stability Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906051308250.5155-100000@presto.innominate.local>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
i just would like to know about the state of SOFTUPDATES in -current
and in -stable (are there differences ?) for heavy load situations ...
is anyone here running SOFTUPDATES in such situations without trouble ?
i'm asking because i noticed some problems then high load benchmarking
a FreeBSD machine with SOFTUPDATES enabled (ended up in an unusable
filesystem) - but i'm not shure if it was due to the SOFTUPDATES or
maybe due to other kernel options or the ata driver (but i did not use
busmastering ...)
so it would be nice if someone could post here or mail me some experiences
with SOFTUPDATES in "production" environments (yes i know its labeled
alpha :-)
t
--
graichen@innominate.de
innominate GmbH
networking people
fon: +49.30.308806-13 fax: -77 web: http://innominate.de pgp: /pgp/tg
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9906051308250.5155-100000>