Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:16:58 -0400 From: Munish Chopra <mchopra@engmail.uwaterloo.ca> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The sysinstall's safe_realloc() failure Message-ID: <20030512001658.GA77586@opiate.soulwax.net> In-Reply-To: <20030511234109.GC66670@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20030509115517.GF6082@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20030509222224L.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <3EBD16E4.1060903@jocose.org> <20030511184329Y.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20030511234109.GC66670@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2003-05-11 16:41 +0000, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 06:43:29PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > > > > peter> This works for me. Some problem with the lukemftpd I guess. > > > > Hmm, maybe. However, you know, lukemftpd is *old*; I'm just > > installing tnftpd 2.0 beta3 to the host (ya ya, it is easy to make > > Since I've already gotten one email about this.. I assume you are talking > about the ports version, not the /usr/src/contrib/ version. The > /usr/src/contrib was last synced with the NetBSD CVS repo on 2003-02-02. > The date on the tnftpd-2.0-beta3.tar.gz distribution is Feb 2003-02-26. > The differences between the two are in the "portability" area. Which > FreeBSD doesn't need very much as we are also BSD. One can get the > /usr/src/contrib version by adding "WANT_LUKEMFTPD=yes" to /etc/make.conf > WANT_LUKEMFTPD is undocumented, it doesn't exist in /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf or in make.conf(5). Will that replace the stock ftpd, or just additionally install lukemftpd? -- Munish Chopra
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030512001658.GA77586>