Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 22:29:03 -0500 From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> To: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IP bugs in FreeBSD 2.1.5 Message-ID: <l03010503ae8a050b6f01@[208.2.87.4]> In-Reply-To: <199610160224.VAA26891@brasil.moneng.mei.com> References: <199610160117.KAA27501@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Oct 16, 96 10:47:45 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>If need be, make it clear to people that 2.1.5R may be a more suitable >choice for the sake of stability, and follow up with a 2.2.5R cleanup >release to handle the problems discovered in 2.2R. > >At some point, the line has to be drawn. I generally agree with your approach. However I would suggest that not 2.1.5, but 2.1.x is the appropriate one for production. IMHO, we need to continue to provide some support for it until what would by current practice be called 2.2.5 comes out. I also think that it would improve our image if we would call THAT release 2.2.0 and have a formal PRE_RELEASE that we call 2.2 Beta.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l03010503ae8a050b6f01>