Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 14:53:38 -0800 From: Nate Williams <nate@sneezy.sri.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-bin@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/df df.c Message-ID: <199702172253.OAA26025@swift.rmlnet> In-Reply-To: <199702170846.QAA01085@spinner.DIALix.COM> References: <25948.856166916@time.cdrom.com> <199702170846.QAA01085@spinner.DIALix.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Please do this right by importing Lite2 and merging the relevant parts. > > > > Oh bleah. Vendor branch stuff. Can I just easy-import it with a vendor > > id of LITE2 or something and it'll DTRT? This has always been where > > my CVS knowledge gets fuzzy, and why I've never updated our version > > of GNU tar to 1.18 (I knew I'd have to do it as a contrib thing, and > > that'd involve branch hair :-). > > I didn't see what happened last time I suggested it, but I think the best > way to update the utilities to Lite2 is to import Lite2 for the entire > userland, allowing the tree to break and then spend 2 weeks fixing the > resulting chaos. I agree, and since the tree is already broken from the kernel stuff.. ;) Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702172253.OAA26025>