Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 19:52:37 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> Cc: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: perl5 is needed to build kernel, why the a make.conf option NOPERL5 ? Message-ID: <199811161752.TAA01647@greenpeace.grondar.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of " Mon, 16 Nov 1998 17:21:01 %2B0100." <19981116172101.37257@follo.net> References: <199811160606.IAA04093@greenpeace.grondar.za> <199811160618.WAA00540@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <19981116083046.A4393@klemm.gtn.com> <199811161151.NAA00668@greenpeace.grondar.za> <19981116172101.37257@follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eivind Eklund wrote: > I think the first one also is nice to have. Some of us want to update perl > and the rest of the system independently of each other (e.g, due to local > hacks to the perl code, for people doing development of Perl itself). OK - I'll buy that. I'd prefer it to be undocumented, so people won't find the switch, frob it, and get burnt. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811161752.TAA01647>