Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:46:45 -0200 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenBSD's spamd. Message-ID: <200612191146.45521.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <4587D1B6.6060500@andric.com> References: <200612191227.kBJCRRLJ054427@lurza.secnetix.de> <4587D1B6.6060500@andric.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 09:49, Dimitry Andric wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > What does stuttering mean? Is it similar to sendmail's > > "greet_pause" feature? > > See here: > > http://www.ualberta.ca/~beck/nycbug06/spamd/mgp00014.html > why the spam daemon should introduce an artificial delay=20 (tarpit) if this can be done already before like Oliver=20 said, it would only eat up and slow down threads between=20 both daemons (smtp + spamd) and overall spamd doesn't even=20 talk directly to the remote smtp =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200612191146.45521.joao>