Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:46:45 -0200 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenBSD's spamd. Message-ID: <200612191146.45521.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <4587D1B6.6060500@andric.com> References: <200612191227.kBJCRRLJ054427@lurza.secnetix.de> <4587D1B6.6060500@andric.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 09:49, Dimitry Andric wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > What does stuttering mean? Is it similar to sendmail's > > "greet_pause" feature? > > See here: > > http://www.ualberta.ca/~beck/nycbug06/spamd/mgp00014.html > why the spam daemon should introduce an artificial delay (tarpit) if this can be done already before like Oliver said, it would only eat up and slow down threads between both daemons (smtp + spamd) and overall spamd doesn't even talk directly to the remote smtp -- Joćo A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200612191146.45521.joao>