Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:06:38 +0200 From: Martin Steegmanns <martin@steegmanns.net> To: Neel Natu <neelnatu@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problem with vmexit on mtrap Message-ID: <20140819090638.GD5519@mail.demonism.de> In-Reply-To: <CAFgRE9GSzAAMojX4ZZ13VV3GpUjiAX4DWDu5NNeCr2kwZYyQfQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20140812092407.GC11403@mail.demonism.de> <CAFgRE9GEXfXbiUjW-dJB7u5Bdqp7sE7k4L1fKmrT8n8OJt19oQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140816193345.GC5519@mail.demonism.de> <CAFgRE9GSzAAMojX4ZZ13VV3GpUjiAX4DWDu5NNeCr2kwZYyQfQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 08:59:28PM -0700, Neel Natu wrote: > > I wonder if a vmexit caused by the MTF could overlay with another > > vmexit. With the MTF bit set, I expect the guest system to > > behave exactly as without the MTF bit. Of course slower due to > > single stepping :). > > On my Xeon E5-2650 running at 2.0GHz a single vcpu VM is still not at > the login prompt after 7+ hours with MTRAP enabled. > > However, it is making forward progress and is chugging through the > /etc/rc startup scripts very slowly. Thank you! I assumed malfunction because I did no expect it to be that slow. Regards, Martin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140819090638.GD5519>