Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:42:05 -0700 From: Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com> To: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Giulio Ferro <auryn@zirakzigil.org>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Issue with igb and lagg (was Re: Problem with link aggregation + sshd) Message-ID: <1347493325.4686.7.camel@powernoodle> In-Reply-To: <CAFOYbcm6fv5Y8LkN_QgUoDmSk1pcQoc=yq1S7wgR4x4QW8WwSQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <5033FB17.7020600@zirakzigil.org> <503884A0.50708@zirakzigil.org> <FF06542A-9507-4C8C-99EC-8275B04D4CF1@my.gd> <E183609A-19E1-4EF4-B08D-FAA55779E193@my.gd> <503BC8F5.3040208@zirakzigil.org> <CAE63ME6oi_5Yam5wXuJzYBhhv%2BN6MnQPOXReXo2Ugo1hjvv25Q@mail.gmail.com> <503E7A16.6030600@zirakzigil.org> <5044F62E.8030001@zirakzigil.org> <CAPyG9gMaNnLJOE00bH66qpAoJfdU=YtpUvz24fj%2B1nyvjDDCAg@mail.gmail.com> <504FA735.709@zirakzigil.org> <CAOjFWZ4kr3sVmymCgh5Fchhm2QR42GAquwHhdgA=MBLY4U-xhA@mail.gmail.com> <5050E107.6090403@zirakzigil.org> <CAOjFWZ682YTzN-PQwujdm=kVvyQpJzNb7wtbVNZnMcjOn_gFeg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFOYbcmXv7d7=mfafR3JsEkwgSN1dZtmvqmp1p2PXyV27oH9GQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOjFWZ47wES2RdkuftP7FGJqwDFN=t6z%2Bjbh6zSeuLJGJas81w@mail.gmail.com> <CAFOYbcm6fv5Y8LkN_QgUoDmSk1pcQoc=yq1S7wgR4x4QW8WwSQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > igb+lagg worked for us on 8.3. Haven't tried it since moving to 9.0 > > and 9-STABLE on those three boxes. > > > > igb+lagg doesn't work for him on 9.0. Although, I don't recall if > > non-LACP options were tried earlier in this thread, or if it's just > > the LACP mode that's failing. If one mode works (say failover) and > > LACP mode doesn't, that "seems to" point to lagg. > > > > I'll see if I can free up an igb port on my 9.0 and 9-STABLE boxes to > > test this with as well. > > > > > > I wouldn't use 9.0, go with 9.1 RC or whatever has the latest igb code, > if you see the issue there I can see about getting some time to look into > it here. > > Jack We're running igb + lagg on two interfaces here at Yahoo without issues like this. We're using LACP exclusively with Cisco switches. If you're seeing failover issues, I wonder if its the switch you're using as opposed to the host and ethernet card? Just a shot in the dark here. Sean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1347493325.4686.7.camel>