Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:51:09 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org> Cc: attilio@FreeBSD.org, Ian Lepore <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [RFQ] make witness panic an option Message-ID: <50A555BD.1010105@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=S3a1pyLHOe%2BSayVNDe=mAogQnkNpnSTakpOm56EdOUQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-Vmo=i=Amo_QqHi4GnGie0Gc0YnK3XaRKjvBO-=SFboFYPmA@mail.gmail.com> <1353001175.1217.153.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <CAJ-FndBP5Pi=SCpyBLK3b=HM_gQ9u8M4%2B1tLk9tA5X-gqismVA@mail.gmail.com> <1353009310.1217.172.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <CAJ-Vmo=S3a1pyLHOe%2BSayVNDe=mAogQnkNpnSTakpOm56EdOUQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 15/11/2012 22:00 Adrian Chadd said the following: > But I think my change is invaluable for development, where you want to > improve and debug the locking and lock interactions of a subsystem. My practical experience was that if you mess up one lock in one place, then it is a total mess further on. but apparently you've got a different practical experience :-) What would indeed be invaluable to _me_ - if the LOR messages also produced the stack(s) where a supposedly correct lock order was learned. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50A555BD.1010105>