Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:35:55 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: scottl@samsco.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, netchild@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, sam@errno.com, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linprocfs linprocfs.c Message-ID: <20070122073555.GA837@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <200701212037.25404.max@love2party.net> References: <45B28A31.4080604@samsco.org> <20070121131229.014eda2e@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20070121.084719.-233674217.imp@bsdimp.com> <200701212037.25404.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2007-Jan-21 20:36:39 +0100, Max Laier wrote: >That's right, but I think we can fix it by simply making int64_t an alias= =20 >for "long long" on all architectures. I still haven't heard any reason=20 >not to just do this - is there something, other than historical? Or we could re-write the kernel in C++ so that the various inttypes know how to print themselves without programmers trying to second- guess what the underlying type of foo_t is. :-) :-) --=20 Peter Jeremy --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFtGlb/opHv/APuIcRAqz2AJ4snr/ODXWjussUh/iDEzhhLERvzgCglr6v VO6efX2QivHP2Ocb0T1aQJs= =3qBT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070122073555.GA837>