Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 10:21:06 -0500 (EST) From: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: codecrusader and ntp Message-ID: <14525.13666.847921.132509@onceler.kcilink.com> In-Reply-To: <3434.951881284@brown.pfcs.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002292015100.49213-100000@katie.integratus.com> <3434.951881284@brown.pfcs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "HS" == Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com> writes: HS> OK, the NTP problem is an old bug that has already been fixed. HS> There was a time in 3-STABLE where some of the time structures went from HS> microseconds to nanoseconds (as I recall). Speaking of which, what's the reason/benefit of using ntp as opposed to the xntpd which is included in the base system of 3.4? Is ntp cleaner/leaner/faster or is it just an alternative that people are used to? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14525.13666.847921.132509>