Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 02:10:45 -0600 (MDT) From: Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: joe@joe-lewis.com Subject: Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x? Message-ID: <20031005020513.C45148-100000@skywalker.rogness.net> In-Reply-To: <20031004203310.GA60712@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 02:12:53PM -0600, Joe Lewis wrote: > > Question for you guru's; > > > I've been trying to install a PAM module on my FreeBSD 5.1 system. > Unfortunately, someone thought they were bright and included OpenPAM, > which would be fine and dandy except for it is installed by default as > static. This means I PAM is now AM, because nothing is pluggable. And > the documentation on getting a 3rd party module to work is like slitting > your wrists and doing pushups in salt water. What is the PAM module? Where are you having problems, Compiling? How about some logs or error messages or something. How about the PAM module code itself? Send more info and as Kris suggested be a tad more professional or at least polite ;-P There have been PAM changes from 4.X to 5.X, mostly just changing a few things. I've had to change my PAM module several times, I do it by simply looking at existing PAM modules and determining what's changed. Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net> - How many people here have telekenetic powers? Raise my hand. -Emo Philips
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031005020513.C45148-100000>