Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 09:26:15 +0200 From: Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson@gmail.com> To: Freebsd fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: State of FUSE on FreeBSD Message-ID: <91E457A2-2DE9-4EAB-B5B2-3EF304254DE2@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87poc8tx19.fsf@vostro.rath.org> References: <87y3r0ankb.fsf@vostro.rath.org> <39c45819-2754-ed73-a0e7-681969f58de7@freebsd.org> <5C15DFF5-661E-47ED-B84B-6BE477A2DE5C@gmail.com> <87poc8tx19.fsf@vostro.rath.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 06 Aug 2017, at 19:40, Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> wrote: > > On Aug 06 2017, Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 03 Aug 2017, at 22:22, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 3/8/17 7:38 pm, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am the upstream maintainer of libfuse. I'd like to refresh / improve >>>> the FreeBSD support in libfuse. My goal is for libfuse not to require >>>> any FreeBSD specific patches. >>> >>> Hi, great to hear from you! >>> at $JOB we use libfuse and We have always worried that we don't really >>> have anyone in FreeBSD that really has fuse as a priority. >> >> Glad to hear from Nikolaus too, seeing that efforts are taken to keep >> libfuse FreeBSD compatible out of the box ! For sure this is great ! >> >> I also hugely use fuse, so having it to work correctly (at least >> bug-free) is mandatory for me. > > Would you mind testing the newest libfuse release then? I just tested to compile it out of the box, it seems to fail : https://benrubson.github.io/fuse.log Note that we are still running 2.9(.5) version on FreeBSD : http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fusefs-libs/ Ben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?91E457A2-2DE9-4EAB-B5B2-3EF304254DE2>