Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 7 Aug 2016 14:25:51 -0700
From:      Doug Hardie <doug@mail.sermon-archive.info>
To:        Florian Ermisch <florian.ermisch@alumni.tu-berlin.de>
Cc:        Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: freebsd-update from 9.3 to 11.0
Message-ID:  <43AA96F2-993B-4E4E-B052-C8AF8CF76C21@mail.sermon-archive.info>
In-Reply-To: <8DD9F50C-B4D6-4283-8272-A73C3283E089@alumni.tu-berlin.de>
References:  <6CD628FE-DF3B-4AC7-8214-6E6382F6AAA7@mail.sermon-archive.info> <20160807063745.GV96200@home.opsec.eu> <8DD9F50C-B4D6-4283-8272-A73C3283E089@alumni.tu-berlin.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On 7 August 2016, at 13:59, Florian Ermisch =
<florian.ermisch@alumni.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Am 7. August 2016 08:37:45 MESZ, schrieb Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>:
>> [=E2=80=A6]
>>> I have a number of production systems on 9.3 that need to be
>>> upgraded.  I can't go to 10.x as it won't boot on that hardware.
>>> However, 11.0 does boot.  I can't afford the downtime to completely
>>> rebuild them.
>>=20
>> Uh, that sounds complicated.
>=20
> Maybe it's worth the hassle to set up
> a freebsd-update server which provides=20
> a 11.0 Kernel with a 10.x userland as
> 10.x-RELEASE? It's a hack, but only
> needed for the upgrade=E2=80=A6
>=20
> Regards, Florian


Comment #5 to https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211398 =
has a patch that gets you very close to the right place for 9.3.  =
However, that patch works and I am now able to upgrade to 11.0-BETA4.  I =
have one server almost completed.  There are a couple of issues with =
packages, but they are being worked out.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43AA96F2-993B-4E4E-B052-C8AF8CF76C21>