Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:39:48 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: lev@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Merge ping+ping6 and traceroue+traceroute6 to single utilities? Message-ID: <1E09095E-82BB-448E-8EE5-52830F664C3D@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <1218795565.20140111222236@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <1063008459.20140111160525@serebryakov.spb.ru> <52D14140.3090003@gibfest.dk> <a46d4e716d15f48b1d4bd32c22dce45c@mailbox.ijs.si> <1218795565.20140111222236@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11 Jan 2014, at 18:22 , Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Hello, Mark. > You wrote 11 января 2014 г., 17:32:41: > > MM> The ping6 and traceroute6 could be made just links to a common utility > MM> and turn on the -6 option implicitly. For a transition period I could > MM> live with the -4 being a default, if that would be a consensus. > Exactly my point of view. Question — will you preserve (conflicting) command line options and if it’s one utility and I use a hostname how will it know how to interpret them? — Bjoern A. Zeeb ????????? ??? ??????? ??????: '??? ??? ???? ?????? ??????? ?? ?? ??????? ??????? ??? ????? ????? ???? ?????? ?? ????? ????', ????????? ?????????, "??? ????? ?? ?????", ?.???
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1E09095E-82BB-448E-8EE5-52830F664C3D>