Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 10:57:22 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Message-ID: <200012101557.KAA29588@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <14899.41809.754369.259894@guru.mired.org> References: <14898.33404.356173.963351@guru.mired.org> <14898.31393.228926.763711@guru.mired.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012091347030.88984-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> <200012100904.CAA27546@harmony.village.org> <3A336781.94E1646@newsguy.com> <14899.41809.754369.259894@guru.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Please watch your carbon copies!] <<On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 09:37:53 -0600 (CST), Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> said: > However, FreeBSD is still the only vendor distribution I know of that > installs software in /usr/local. That's the problem - software that > comes from the vendor doesn't belong in the local administrative > regime. No software that is a part of FreeBSD installs in /usr/local. As a convenience feature, FreeBSD includes software from third parties which does so, and in most cases has always done so by default. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200012101557.KAA29588>