Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:41:53 -0600 (MDT) From: Troy Barnhart <barney@rapidnet.com> To: Massimo Lusetti <massimo@datacode.it> Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NAS solution Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0109111236440.1288-100000@rapidnet.com> In-Reply-To: <999077449.3b8cb649bd365@webapps.datacode.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I am currently developing a SAN/NAS project at work. I just had a working session yesterday w/ an IBM storage specialist and engineer. HP has pulled their NAS-type stuff off the market. HP's backup's portion of SAN/Fibrechannel stuff is damn nice. Take a look at IBM's ESS "Shark" or FastStorage500 or NAS300g items... Actually, the IBM solution (based on AIX-RS600) is pretty damn good, but spendy. barney On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > > I've to choose a network attached solutions to serve a file base about 200 GB > (growing) via NSF and CIFS/SMB to about 15 WKS. > > Does anyone have any experience ? > In particular you believe is the case to look at solutions form vendors like > IBM or HP or just build a solid server with a lot of disks in (which i think > solution from vendors are like) ?! > > Thanks. > > Regards > -- > Massimo Lusetti > Network Department Manager To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0109111236440.1288-100000>