Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 12:20:06 -0400 (EDT) From: James Howard <howardjp@glue.umd.edu> To: Matthew Fuller <fullermd@linkfast.net> Cc: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in>, David Scheidt <dscheidt@enteract.com>, Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>, Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ViM vs. Emacs Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0004201216070.21687-100000@y.glue.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <20000420105231.J43688@linkfast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Matthew Fuller wrote: > The way it is makes sense to me. > u undo's your last change. Then you keep hitting '.' to keep undoing > back as far as you want. > Hitting 'u' again instead of '.' lets you undo the undo's, which is FAR > more valuable then continuing to undo. I have been following this argument very closely and I want to know how this applies to shells. Specifically, when I run sh, should I set -E or -V? <jamie holds his Zippo to the fuse and runs away> J~ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.21.0004201216070.21687-100000>