Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:59:48 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> To: othermark <atkin901@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advice on the lightweight resolver, lwres. Message-ID: <ygeek1bpkh7.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <dupkpt$u7q$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <dupkpt$u7q$1@sea.gmane.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hi,
>>>>> On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 08:23:24 -0800
>>>>> othermark <atkin901@yahoo.com> said:
atkin901> I was working on converting the STAF (staf.sourceforge.net) project to an
atkin901> freebsd port, and on my first attempt, I attempted to use the lightweight
atkin901> resolver library because of the thread safe functions _r() that were
atkin901> available.
FYI: Though we don't expose _r() functions, our netdb functions
without _r are thread-safe. So, you don't need _r() functions to be
thread-safe.
Further, getaddrinfo(3) in lwres still has query order problem which
was solved in our getaddrinfo(3).
BTW, I'm now working on upgrading the base of our resolver to BIND8's.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ygeek1bpkh7.wl%ume>