Date: 13 Dec 2000 09:50:42 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, assar@FreeBSD.ORG, Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, kris@citusc.usc.edu, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Safe string formatting in the kernel Message-ID: <xzpg0js7li5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp's message of "Tue, 12 Dec 2000 23:43:22 %2B0100" References: <55081.976661002@critter>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes: > In message <200012122228.PAA33203@harmony.village.org>, Warner Losh writes: > >If there's a known, realtively small, upper limit, why does allocating > >it dynamically buy you when you could have a static buffer? > I have not reread DES's implementation, but in my design doc you > could initialize an sbuf with your own buffer, for exactly that > reason. Yes. Please read the patch before criticizing it. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpg0js7li5.fsf>