Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 20:30:35 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Matthias Buelow <mkb@mukappabeta.de> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: APIC: Previous IPI is stuck Message-ID: <40F9E0CB.4090106@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <40F9DD1B.3050902@mukappabeta.de> References: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C85337051D936E@mail.sandvine.com> <200407180146.i6I1kiQ9004838@apollo.backplane.com> <40F9DD1B.3050902@mukappabeta.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthias Buelow wrote: > Matthew Dillon wrote: > >> I would expect it to perform about the same as the existing code. >> The >> main reasons to use it are that it consolidates the half dozen IPI >> mechanisms used by FreeBSD-5 into *one* mechanism, it completely > > > Don't you (and others on this list) think that these things come a bit > late now? I have just subscribed to this list since I'm using 5.2.1 and > what I expected were discussions like, the last few bugs being ironed > out, things getting polished for a stable 5.x tree, and not grass-roots > discussions about the basic system architecture. This comes about 2-3 > years late, folks. Please get your things together and stabilize the > beast now. > The 'fix the bugs' discussions are going on too. However, this is the freebsd-current list, and it's always nice to discuss things that might be suitable further down the road. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40F9E0CB.4090106>