Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:02:18 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> To: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: GCC withdraw (was: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc) Message-ID: <5217413A.9080105@passap.ru> In-Reply-To: <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
23.08.2013 13:16, David Chisnall пишет: > I have a patch that I intend to commit before the 10.0 code slush that removes GCC and libstdc++ from the default build on platforms where clang is the system compiler. We definitely don't want to be supporting our 6-year-old versions of these for the lifetime of the 10.x branch. Isn't it a POLA violation? As for me I expect something like this: . 9.x gcc default and clang in base; . 10.x clang default and gcc in base; . 11.x gcc withdraw. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5217413A.9080105>