Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Dec 1996 13:01:11 -0500
From:      dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
To:        "Jacob Suter" <jsuter@intrastar.net>
Cc:        isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Bandwidth..
Message-ID:  <3.0.32.19961230130108.00aadb70@etinc.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>The 386 handled 7,500 hits/day (one of my users decided to put up a porn
>site) for about a week without too much trouble.  I'd never want to try to
>make it do it again though :-)

I think that <6 hits per minute is not a major task for any processor...
surely you cant be implying that you need a pentium for that kind of volume?

The problem here probably has more to do with your $9. ISA IDE
controller than it does the '386 vs Pentium. A  (slow) '486 with a PCI IDE
controller not only has more processor power, but also much higher
bus throughput to the disk. 

I dont think that anyone would recommend a '386 for anything nowadays
(with '486-100s with on-board PCI IDE at about $100.)....I was talking
much more about the '486 or 100Mhz Pentium vs the higher end
stuff than obsoleted equipment like '386.

Dennis



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.32.19961230130108.00aadb70>