Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 08:50:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, dan.langille@dvl-software.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Nowlin <mike@argos.org> Subject: Re: named timeouts Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990616084939.21488B-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpyahkcq9x.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16 Jun 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Doh! I inverted 'to' and 'from' in my head. Am I the only one to > expect 'from' to come before 'to'? I expect it this way too, just like PR reports... 'State-Changed: Open->Closed' From->To just makes sense. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990616084939.21488B-100000>