Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 12:26:11 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh <itojun@itojun.org>, dg@root.com Cc: obrien@NUXI.com, Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6 in -current Message-ID: <19981102122611.56328@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <4612.910005363@coconut.itojun.org>; from Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh on Mon, Nov 02, 1998 at 08:16:03PM %2B0900 References: <199811021048.CAA01511@implode.root.com> <4612.910005363@coconut.itojun.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 02, 1998 at 08:16:03PM +0900, Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh wrote: [On KAME vs Inria] > If it is packaging issues, I would like to state the following for > KAME 2.2.7 kit: > - we intentionally NOT overwriting existing tools, > like /usr/bin/ftp. This surprises people too much, especially > in multiuser installations. > - we are trying NOT to require "make World" for installation. > therefore, we do not use /usr/src tree for this. > It can be changed for KAME 3.0, of course. Everything negative towards KAME that I've seen has been on the packaging - that it is not fully integrated. If you are willing to fully integrate it, that issue seems moot. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981102122611.56328>