Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 00:50:01 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely5.cicely.de> To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> Cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mcclock funnies... Message-ID: <20010206005001.C548@cicely5.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102051504590.3402-100000@zeppo.feral.com>; from mjacob@feral.com on Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 03:06:54PM -0800 References: <20010205235851.A548@cicely5.cicely.de> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102051504590.3402-100000@zeppo.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 03:06:54PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > Yes. > > Apparently writes of 1 (for 2001) are confusing it. I thought it was just my > one (possibly) flakey system. But guess not. > > I'll try *not* subtracting off the 100. This is not a y2k compliant chip, so > some toe stubbing seems to need to occur. Up to now I asumed the warning to be harmless. But It looks like I'm fooling myself as I have ntpdate and ntpd in all my configs. A look into /var/run tells me that the system realy started a year behind. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010206005001.C548>