Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:55:37 +0100 From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> To: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Switch from legacy ata(4) to CAM-based ATA Message-ID: <20110420225537.00002200@unknown> In-Reply-To: <4DAF4D78.4010205@FreeBSD.org> References: <4DAEAE1B.70207@FreeBSD.org> <20110420132001.000058e1@unknown> <4DAECFDC.2050508@FreeBSD.org> <20110420191922.00002482@unknown> <4DAF2BFC.3030504@FreeBSD.org> <4DAF4D78.4010205@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:17:44 +0300 Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > 2 Bruce: Looking on XEN sources, it seems that the only place how it > differs missing and present disk is the device signature. ata(4) at > this moment doesn't checks signature if it is not ATAPI and READY bit > is set. Attached patch should solve the problem by using more strict > check, and I only hope it won't break anything else. Try it please. That seems to have fixed it. Thanks! -- Bruce Cran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110420225537.00002200>