Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 08:06:34 -0400
From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Cc: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>, av <des@des.no>, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: KTR_SPAREx
Message-ID: <201206060806.34245.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FCE8AF7.40606@freebsd.org>
References: <86bokyvtc2.fsf@ds4.des.no> <CAJ-FndAjcfd21xwYHPrSxgz32eHp2xTGRao1Kyqx4yBZTPD94A@mail.gmail.com> <4FCE8AF7.40606@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, June 05, 2012 6:40:55 pm Peter Grehan wrote: > > We very much need an much higher granularity on KTR classes and > > possibly a way to use it on-the-fly for kernel development and I think > > what I suggested earlier makes sense. > > Anyone had a look at Dragonfly's ktr ? > > http://gitweb.dragonflybsd.org/dragonfly.git/blob/HEAD:/sys/sys/ktr.h That does seem to be closer to what I would like. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201206060806.34245.jhb>