Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:03:56 +0200 From: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> To: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> Cc: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ZFS backup Q: send/recv and mountpoint property Message-ID: <C5928825-5CA7-44DB-A62F-3F97C6FC61C8@sarenet.es> In-Reply-To: <BE8539E1-351B-4C77-8A34-FE6CE665AA40@sarenet.es> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1807222110450.28320@woozle.rinet.ru> <BE8539E1-351B-4C77-8A34-FE6CE665AA40@sarenet.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 13 Aug 2018, at 11:47, Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> wrote: > Otherwise, unless you have atime=3Doff any read access will change the = last access > timestamps, which means that incremental snapshots won=E2=80=99t apply = unless you force > a rollback with a -N. Using -N is itself a bad idea because, in case = of error, you might > end up rolling back something you don=E2=80=99t want. If you avoid the = rollback you will > avoid making the recv destructive in any way. I mean -F of course, not -N. Thanks to the attentive readers who poked = me! :P Borja.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C5928825-5CA7-44DB-A62F-3F97C6FC61C8>