Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:27:59 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: iSCSI vs. SMB with ZFS. Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212122327030.1476@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <CACpH0Md5H2C0a4Cc8iwFa5M6v3oGFXmydbvHPs_MOY53CXiYfA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACpH0Md5H2C0a4Cc8iwFa5M6v3oGFXmydbvHPs_MOY53CXiYfA@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
as you show your needs for unshared data for single workstation is in order of single large hard drive. reducing drive count on file server by one and connecting this one drive directly to workstation is the best solutionhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1212122327030.1476>