Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:27:59 +0100 (CET)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: iSCSI vs. SMB with ZFS.
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212122327030.1476@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <CACpH0Md5H2C0a4Cc8iwFa5M6v3oGFXmydbvHPs_MOY53CXiYfA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CACpH0Md5H2C0a4Cc8iwFa5M6v3oGFXmydbvHPs_MOY53CXiYfA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
as you show your needs for unshared data for single workstation is in 
order of single large hard drive.

reducing drive count on file server by one and connecting this one drive 
directly to workstation is the best solution



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1212122327030.1476>