Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:03:28 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: David Landgren <david@landgren.net> Cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multi CPU support in 6.0 Message-ID: <20051108190327.GA24711@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <4370E774.2080004@landgren.net> References: <01d301c5e3ae$b2461840$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <20051107152718.GA4743@tara.freenix.org> <10EFEEF4-D1D4-45FC-991C-60A4E60FB391@bnc.net> <20051108164520.GA81940@xor.obsecurity.org> <4370E4C3.5000204@landgren.net> <20051108175203.GA7472@xor.obsecurity.org> <4370E774.2080004@landgren.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:59:16PM +0100, David Landgren wrote: > And Kris Kennaway did write: > > >On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:47:47PM +0100, David Landgren wrote: > > [...] > > >>Are there any obvious additions or subtractions from a 5.x kernel > >>configuration file? Is ADAPTIVE_GIANT now obsolete? > > > > > >I think you still want it - it was a net win the last time I measured > >it. That's it though, really. > > Thanks for the quick response. So, I'll leave that in. > > I've diffed GENERIC and my current config, and I see two new items to add: > > options PREEMPTIONpreemption PREEMPTION, not PREEMPTIONpreemption :) > options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 > > Once I've rebuilt all ports, I could remove COMPAT_FREEBSD5 on a second > rebuild, right? In principle, yes, unless you're using some ports (or third party binaries) that install 5.x binaries. > I assume pf and ALTQ traffic shaping remain the same? That's about the > only other difference to my kernel. I don't use pf myself, but there should be no reason for it not to work. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDcPZ1Wry0BWjoQKURAsFHAKDJmOKygXdD5q+VSy3kzBYRALxCSACbB7yZ BZHmIci4/x5RuWRI50EmAr4= =OLPa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051108190327.GA24711>