Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 11:57:11 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> To: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> Cc: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>, crossd@cs.rpi.edu, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The infamous dying daemons bug Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811091151230.462-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> In-Reply-To: <199811091624.IAA01667@bubba.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 9 Nov 1998, Archie Cobbs wrote: > Eivind Eklund writes: > > > Does this happen to everyone, I personally have *never* seen it happen, > > > and I have run quite a few systems run with full memory utilization. > > > > No. Unfortunately, we've not found any (or I at least don't know of > > any) common factors between all the machines that have this problem. > > Has the use of memory mapping been ruled out as a possible common factor? Hm... dynamically linked binaries mmap() the libraries, correct? And a statically linked binary wouldn't use memory mapping unless it explicitly does so itself? So, would the replacement of a dynamically linked inetd that dies with a static inetd be a valid test here? -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9811091151230.462-100000>