Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 07:52:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Harding <mvh@ix.netcom.com> To: chris@fedde.littleton.co.us Cc: holtor@yahoo.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sendmail 8.11.0 Message-ID: <20000801145216.1DFAEE6C15@netcom1.netcom.com> In-Reply-To: <200008011438.e71Ecud29174@fedde.littleton.co.us> (message from Chris Fedde on Tue, 01 Aug 2000 08:38:56 -0600) References: <200008011438.e71Ecud29174@fedde.littleton.co.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As a sendmail user, you might find it bizarre. As a postfix user, I
don't. Not everyone uses/likes sendmail.
- Mike H.
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Chris Fedde <chris@fedde.littleton.co.us>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 08:38:56 -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-RULES: lists
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000 07:10:32 -0700 (PDT) Holtor wrote:
+------------------
| Hi all - I have been waiting for the base sendmail in
| freebsd, now 8.9.3 to be updated to the latest one
| which is 8.11.0. Anyone have any appox. dates for
| this?
| If its still a distant project, how would we recommend
| upgrading sendmail? That is downloading the source and
| compiling, but FreeBSD has mailwrapper and all those
| utilities which I think I would break? Any help would
| be appreciated.
|
| Holt
+------------------
I just download sendmail, compile it, install it, and start it up.
The existing /etc/rc.conf mechinism continues to work well. I find
the whole mailwrapper thing bizarre in the extreem. It is similar
to the whole /usr/local/etc/rc.d scheme where we are adding a
layer of indirection when there is no need for one.
chris
--
Chris Fedde
303 773 9134
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000801145216.1DFAEE6C15>