Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 16:04:47 +0400 From: Sergei Kolobov <sergei@kolobov.com> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/49961: [PATCH] Mega tree sweep for SITE_PERL usage Message-ID: <20030506120446.GB674@globcon.net> In-Reply-To: <20030312143443.54532.qmail@outpost.globcon.net> References: <20030312143443.54532.qmail@outpost.globcon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2003-03-12 at 14:34 -0000, Sergei Kolobov wrote: > This is a sweep through the ports tree looking for possible usage of SITE_PERL > in Makefile and pkg-plist: > > -RUN_DEPENDS= ${LOCALBASE}/lib/perl5/site_perl/${PERL_VER}/${PERL_ARCH}/Tk.pm:${PORTSDIR}/x11-toolkits/p5-T > k > +RUN_DEPENDS= ${SITE_PERL}/${PERL_ARCH}/Tk.pm:${PORTSDIR}/x11-toolkits/p5-Tk > > and > > -lib/perl5/site_perl/%%PERL_VER%%/X11/Protocol/Connection/UNIXSocket.pm > +%%SITE_PERL%%/X11/Protocol/Connection/UNIXSocket.pm > > IMHO, Makefiles and pkg-plists are much more readable and maintainable this way. > > Note: there are some edge cases - when a variable was defined for the same purpose > as SITE_PERL, but with a different name (e.g. PERL_SITELIBDIR, etc.). > My script did not handle those case yet. > >How-To-Repeat: > >Fix: > The patches are available at the following URL: > > http://www.kolobov.com/site_perl.patches.tar.gz > > The tarball contains a collection of patch files, each file corresponds to a separate ports category. I have created the patched almost 2 months ago and they are getting stale already. Can I ask a committer with some interest in Perl to take a look at them, please? Thanks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030506120446.GB674>