Date: Mon, 9 Oct 1995 03:05:09 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: procfs LKM broken now! Message-ID: <HkrS6UmmI9@ache.dialup.demos.ru> In-Reply-To: <199510082333.QAA07452@phaeton.artisoft.com>; from Terry Lambert at Sun, 8 Oct 1995 16:33:14 -0700 (MST) References: <199510082333.QAA07452@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199510082333.QAA07452@phaeton.artisoft.com> Terry Lambert
writes:
>This is a kernel linking issue. If the kernel is supposedly exporting
>these services, then they must exist regardless of whetheror not they
>are used.
>The X11 code gets around this by causing references in a function code
>body for which the function itself is never called, but for which the
>object module being included is mandatory.
Ok, I like this variant. Who is our LKM commiter(s) to address this
discussion?
--
Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed,
ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead -
FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead.
RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?HkrS6UmmI9>