Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 14:53:06 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: dan.langille@dvl-software.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Nowlin <mike@argos.org> Subject: Re: named timeouts Message-ID: <10509.929537586@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "16 Jun 1999 13:56:42 %2B0200." <xzpyahkcq9x.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <xzpyahkcq9x.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: >> Actually it doesnt, it means that the client closed his socket before >> named got to answer... > >Doh! I inverted 'to' and 'from' in my head. Am I the only one to >expect 'from' to come before 'to'? AHA!!! You never owned a HP calculator! Clearly a math weenie with a TI style "just type it as it is written" attitude :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10509.929537586>