Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 08:49:47 -0700 From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> To: Mike Harding <mvh@ix.netcom.com> Cc: admin@rshb.com.ru, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dirpref gives massive performance boost Message-ID: <200109301550.f8UFoEG02214@cwsys.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 30 Sep 2001 08:24:04 PDT." <20010930152404.581A8133C1@netcom1.netcom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010930152404.581A8133C1@netcom1.netcom.com>, Mike Harding writes: > > Um - what about my question? Is the newfs necessary? Repartitioning, > backup, and restore also require a backup medium, etc. The more of your filesystem that has had its files allocated using the new dirpref, the greater the benefit. There was a comment made earlier in another thread on another list (see archives) that the new dirpref has the risk of greater fragmentation. There were no responses to the comment. I'm not sure whether this is just a concern someone had or whether the risk is real. The fact that there were no replies to that comment seems to indicate we just don't know yet. In some OpenBSD mailing list archives (search Google) there were comments about dirpref + softupdates being 60x faster than UFS without the two features. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD Ministry of Management Services Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109301550.f8UFoEG02214>