Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:32:39 -0500
From:      Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To:        Anton Shterenlikht <as@cmplx.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: https slower than svn+ssh?
Message-ID:  <44a7vz4vzs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
In-Reply-To: <201802231245.w1NCjXM4037579@jail0199.vps.exonetric.net> (Anton Shterenlikht's message of "Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:45:33 GMT")
References:  <201802231245.w1NCjXM4037579@jail0199.vps.exonetric.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anton Shterenlikht <as@cmplx.uk> writes:

> SourceForge says:
>
> "Access over https will not perform as well as svn+ssh,
> so it should only be used if access using svn+ssh is problematic"
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/svn/#readwrite-access-via-https
>
> I wonder if this applies only to SourceForge,
> or is a known fact for any svn connection.

The latter.

If you read the subversion documentation, you will find a listing of the
tradeoffs between the different access methods available.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44a7vz4vzs.fsf>