Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2017 10:40:46 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 171811] [patch] rctl(8) cputime is too high Message-ID: <bug-171811-8-mjp4RRAbp6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-171811-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-171811-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D171811 --- Comment #5 from olevole@olevole.ru --- (In reply to Allan Jude from comment #4) Yes, I know about sa(8) but there are other problems (there is no support f= or jail, only cpu metrics..) Ideally for each component of FreeBSD (jail, racct..) would have a active maintainer. But today FreeBSD is a hobby-OS with a catastrophically small number of developers, fixes can be expected for several years (and not see them).=20 Therefore, if we can not fix the bug, it should be described in the man pag= es. PS: openfiles metrics also give abnormally high values (in a few dozen) via RACCT (compared to fstat / lsof). But without subsystem maintainer and with= out entering such information into the man page, I'm not sure that it makes sen= se to write PR for this. Unfortunately, I can only help with testing (from a practical point of view) and report for issue but do not fix it ;-) Thanks. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-171811-8-mjp4RRAbp6>