Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:41:31 -0400 From: Glenn Sieb <ges+lists@wingfoot.org> To: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@chello.cz> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questionable statement in article Message-ID: <411916DB.3060307@wingfoot.org> In-Reply-To: <20040810181651.GA4929@isis.wad.cz> References: <1091989450.570.2.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <20040808202351.GV87690@submonkey.net> <41168DF7.2090601@wingfoot.org> <4116906E.8060408@elvandar.org> <4116ED12.3000809@wingfoot.org> <20040810181651.GA4929@isis.wad.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Roman Neuhauser said the following on 8/10/2004 2:16 PM: ># ges+lists@wingfoot.org / 2004-08-08 23:18:42 -0400: > > >> I don't see development happening (other than system development, >> such as the OS) happening in BSD. >> >> > > Apache, and other major software. > > > Really? Hmm.. I never knew that Apache is developed for BSD. I thought it was developed for *nix and Windows... distributed as C source so it could be compiled on your platform as needed. I don't recall ever seeing a specific "BSD version' of Apache, other than the fact that I've compiled the source or installed the port, which essentially just compiles the source as well. What am I missing here? The point I've been trying to make (and not many are getting yet) is the simple fact that if I go to, say, Oracle's website... they're developing in Linux. Specifically RedHat Enterprise. Not BSD of any flavor. Veritas--Netware and Windows (shudder). Legato--Windows and various Linuxes. Who is developing for BSD? Why aren't more doing so? What can we do to get them to? Thanks, Glenn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?411916DB.3060307>