Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 08 Jul 2016 16:05:38 +0530
From:      Ravi Pokala <rpokala@mac.com>
To:        Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r302410 - in stable/11: . contrib/jemalloc/include/jemalloc etc/defaults sys/amd64/conf sys/i386/conf sys/powerpc/conf sys/sparc64/conf
Message-ID:  <61B19F6B-17BD-41ED-AAAE-43EC5D5ED0B0@panasas.com>
In-Reply-To: <201607080022.u680MEb1003687@repo.freebsd.org>
References:  <201607080022.u680MEb1003687@repo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----Original Message-----
> From: <owner-src-committers@freebsd.org> on behalf of Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>
> Date: 2016-07-08, Friday at 05:52
> To: <src-committers@freebsd.org>, <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, <svn-src-stable@freebsd.org>, <svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org>
> Subject: svn commit: r302410 - in stable/11: . contrib/jemalloc/include/jemalloc etc/defaults sys/amd64/conf sys/i386/conf sys/powerpc/conf sys/sparc64/conf
> 
> Author: gjb
> Date: Fri Jul  8 00:22:14 2016
> New Revision: 302410
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/302410
> 
> Log:
>   - Remove debugging from GENERIC* kernel configurations
>   - Enable MALLOC_PRODUCTION
>   - Default dumpdev=NO
>   - Remove UPDATING entry regarding debugging features
>   
>   Approved by:	re (implicit)
>   Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation
> 
> Modified:
>   stable/11/UPDATING
>   stable/11/contrib/jemalloc/include/jemalloc/jemalloc_FreeBSD.h
>   stable/11/etc/defaults/rc.conf
>   stable/11/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC
>   stable/11/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC
>   stable/11/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC
>   stable/11/sys/sparc64/conf/GENERIC

Just as we have MI sys/conf/NOTES and MD sys/<arch>/conf/NOTES, would it make sense to have an MI sys/conf/GENERIC for the truly universal options, which could then be included by the MD sys/<arch>/conf/GENERIC versions? That would reduce duplication and make it easier to twiddle knobs like this across the board when needed.

If that sounds reasonable to people, I'll take a swing at that in August, when I get back from my vacation.

Thanks,

Ravi (rpokala@)





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?61B19F6B-17BD-41ED-AAAE-43EC5D5ED0B0>