Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 10:53:02 +0900 From: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh <itojun@itojun.org> To: Janos Mohacsi <mohacsi@bagira.fsz.bme.hu> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6 + IPSec Message-ID: <2482.893209982@coconut.itojun.org> In-Reply-To: mohacsi's message of Wed, 22 Apr 1998 00:57:53 %2B0200. <Pine.SUN.3.96.980422005442.9694C-100000@bagira.fsz.bme.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>According to our test the most stable IPv6 implementation is the INRIA >IPv6 (The result of our test will due to published in TERENA Networking >Conference '98). Althought it does not contain either DES or other >cryptographic software all the hooks in the kernel are available to fill >out. (The necessary code is available from >http://www.ipv6.ticl.co.uk/devpv6.htm ). Unfortunately IPsec is not >available for IPv4 in the INRIA implementation. was WIDE stack participated in the test? I believe there's nobody from WIDE attended. >Compiling the WIDE implementation is quite hard because of misnamed >structure fields, etc. And the kernels dumps core sometimes... The most >important argument against the WIDE IPv6 (for me) that the applications >are not so tightly integrated to the system as in the INRIA. let me know what version of the kernel you used, and troubles you have. I have no trouble here. I suspect you've used old snapshot or something. itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2482.893209982>