Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 16:54:22 -0500 From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> To: Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Cc: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>, John Purser <johnmpurser@home.com>, 'freebsd-chat' <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: costs for solaris vs windows Message-ID: <20000129165422.I45988@shadow.blackdawn.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001292143410.86917-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>; from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org on Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 09:48:13PM %2B0000 References: <20000129160409.G45988@shadow.blackdawn.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001292143410.86917-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 09:48:13PM +0000, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: > I don't quite understand the URL.... does that mean it is a solaris > node? What it _PROBABLY_ means is that that particular area of cnn involves solaris issues. Therefore, it has nothing to do with us. > >Yes, I imagine they're referring to things such as Solaris, Digital > >UNIX, and BSD/OS. I honestly couldn't give a rat's behind about that.. > > I'm not quite sure i follow you. You don't care about commercial Unix costs? > Or what they are saying about the comparison? I don't care about comparisons between Windows something and some commercial Unix. I would only care if they were making valid comparisons between SomeOS and FreeBSD. And if they actually published details. -- Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000129165422.I45988>