Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:09:51 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192878] comms/pr [maintainer] new source location Message-ID: <bug-192878-13-tU82krJXFi@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-192878-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-192878-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192878 --- Comment #28 from C Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #27) > oh well? > > It means your system doesn't understand stage and it means this PR is 100% > untested. > > Grep "check-plist" in Mk/bsd.stage.mk, it is obviously a target, so that > fact that it doesn't recognize it is a big problem. Maybe not at the port > level, but the entire tree level. > > You don't have "NO_STAGE=yes" in your make.conf do you? Or anything else > that blocks it? > > How far away is your poudriere setup from coming online? why don't we just > wait until you can test it? My bsd.stage.mk indicates February 2014. Was check-plist created later? No I have nothing that could possibly interfere with porting in make, or src.conf. The box stages as one would anticipate. In fact, it _insists_ on it. I'll be building the 11 box, once I finish here. I hate leaving things unresolved. Too many "loose ends". I'll be rescuing _many_ ports, once I finish the new box (Saturday, or Sunday). That should prove a good enough "test bed". Don't you think? --Chris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-192878-13-tU82krJXFi>